Whether or not the marital disputes of Jain society can be resolved under the Hindu Marriage Act, the debate is complete, the decision is secured

New Duniya Representative, Indore. Whether or not the marital disputes of Jain society can be resolved under the Hindu Marriage Act, the debate on the issue on this issue was completed on Tuesday. After hearing the arguments of the parties, the court reserved the verdict. Only after its release will the answer to the question that people of Jain society can file a petition under the Hindu Marriage Act to resolve marital disputes. The debate lasted about half an hour on Tuesday.

The petitioner told the court that Jains were also included in the definition of Hindu in the Hindu Marriage Law Act 1949. In the Constitution too, Jain religious people have been kept with Hindus. In the year 2014, Jain society was declared a minority. Since then, the Jain couple’s disputes have been resolving under the Hindu Marriage Act. Many cases have also been disposed of.

• The Indore Kutumb Court recently canceled the petitions of marriage-to-marriage of the parties of Jain society, saying that the Jain society has been declared a minority community by the central government.
• A gazette in this regard has also been released on 27 January 2014. In such a situation, followers of Jain society do not have the right to obtain eradication under the Hindu Marriage Act.
• He is going to reject the fundamental Vedic beliefs of Hinduism and separated themselves from the majority of Hindu community.
• Marital matters related to them cannot be resolved under the Hindu Marriage Act. The parties have filed petitions in the High Court challenging this decision of the Kutumb Court.
• Advocate Pankaj Khandelwal argued in the court while advocating on behalf of the party on Tuesday that Jains were also included in the definition of Hindu in the Constitution.
• The Hindu Successor Act also includes Jain religious people in the Hindu’s perishable.

Justice of Justice did not come

On the previous hearing, the court had made senior advocate AK Sethi a judiciary in this case and asked him to study the matter and give his opinion. On Tuesday, he had to put it before the Rai Court, but he could not be present.